Vendor research on the subject of customers’ Enterprise Resource Planning priorities is generally very lame. The research largely comes up with the vague answers that the Vendor first thought of – and these are generally the same as those identified in the last report you read on the subject.
On the one hand the latest report from Microsoft is no different:
Really? No *&^% Sherlock! These goals are what Enterprise Resource Planning has always been about. FOREVER. Business systems are like WD40 or 3-in-1 oil. They exist to eliminate friction in a business – like oiling the wheels. These goals are outcomes associated with doing so. The key issue customers need to identify is – where’s the friction? Focus their ERP investments on that. That’s what TNP’s Day In The Life helps with.
On the other hand, this report from Microsoft does genuinely surprise:
News that customers have concerns with regards to the up front expense of implementing a new ERP system, or upgrading their existing solution is not new.
What is different in this report is the extent to which Security shows up as a priority. This is new. What’s driving the change?
The NAV/BC Partner community is evolving in response. Acora, TSG, Kick IT, Quantiq (now Avanade) and now TNP have all been on a similar journey – bringing their biz app capability together with a wider range of IT service capability.
That said – the more things change, the more things stay the same. Successful projects continue to rely upon cultural alignment between supplier and customer – and the depth of relevant specialist capability that the supplier has to offer. To read more of our thoughts on this subject take a look at our whitepapers, 'The Alternative Guide to Buying ERP' and 'Pick a Partner, Not a Price'.
To read more about the research Microsoft commissioned, find the report here.